The Bible mentions the hair of men and women in multiple places. From Samson’s long hair to Paul’s instruction about short hair, hair — or the lack of it in Elisha’s case — plays a role in several stories in the Bible. The details in these stories cause people to ask questions about hair grooming, which include whether or not cutting your hair is a sin.
Cutting your hair isn’t a sin, which means that it doesn’t violate God’s moral standards. People who cut their hair have no need to repent or confess sin. Some characters in the Bible were known in part for their long hair like Absalom, yet even he got his hair cut once a year to manage its weight (2 Sam. 14:26).
Who does the Bible say cut their hair? Did people have long hair in the Old Testament? Did people have long hair in the New Testament? Why does Paul say that having long hair is a shame for a man? Keep reading to learn the answers to these questions and others.
Also see Does the Bible Say Fear Is A Sin? to learn more.
The Bible’s instructions for wearing and managing hair
Most scholars agree that what the Bible teaches about hairstyles is either unique to individuals (e.g. Samson) or unique to the society in which the instruction was given (e.g. Greece). This doesn’t mean that readers can’t extract principles from these stories, but it does make their instruction culturally relative.
Did people have long hair in the Old Testament? Jewish women generally wore their hair long in the Old Testament era. Some men had long hair, too, like Absalom and Samson. Some readers speculate that people in the Old Testament didn’t have the means to regularly cut hair, but others respond that all it took was a sharp knife or a jagged stone to do the job. Ezekiel also implies that there were barbers in Israel (5:1).
Many scholars believe that having long hair was a cultural convention for men and women before the time of Jesus Christ. “The normal Israelite custom, for both sexes, seems to have been to let the hair grow to considerable length.”  Some readers wonder how this fact aligns with verses that teach that men shouldn’t take on the appearance of a woman.
Deuteronomy 22:5 instructs men not to wear women’s clothing: “A woman shall not wear a man’s garment, nor shall a man put on a woman’s cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God” (ESV). The verse doesn’t mention that the length of a man’s hair was offensive to God. The assumption that it was may be rooted in modern generational norms.
Why did people have long hair in the Old Testament? There are likely multiple answers to this question. Some scholars argue that having lots of hair set the Israelites apart from the Egyptians. In ancient Egypt, the cultural norm was to shave the head and the face. The long hair that many Jews wore and the beards the men grew differentiated them from the people that once held them captive for 400 years.
Egyptian grooming customs are evident in the story of Joseph. Genesis 41:14 reads, “Then Pharaoh sent and called Joseph, and they quickly brought him out of the pit. And when he had shaved himself and changed his clothes, he came in before Pharaoh” (ESV). There is no indication in the text that Joseph sinned by shaving himself. In fact, God showed great favor in Egypt.
Also see Are Subliminals A Sin? to learn more.
Why couldn’t the Jews cut their forelocks? Leviticus 19:27 reads, “You shall not round off the hair on your temples or mar the edges of your beard” (ESV). Scholars know that pagan cults shaved their forelocks as a sign of faithfulness to their belief system. God’s instruction to his people signified the exact opposite of the appearance of unbelievers to disassociate them from false belief systems.
Additionally, long hair was a sign of heath in ancient Israel. In contrast, baldness was associated with diseases like leprosy. A man could lose his hair and still be ceremonially clean, and diseases were sometimes associated with hair and beards (e.g. Lev. 13:40-44). Nevertheless, lots of healthy hair was generally a sign of youth and physical wellness.
Why does Paul say that having long hair is a shame for a man?
In 1 Corinthians, Paul writes, “Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him, but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory?” (v. 14-15a). Does the fact that Paul’s argument is based on “nature” refute the idea that this instruction is culturally relative? Didn’t Paul grow out his hair when he took a Nazirite vow?
What does Paul mean when he says “nature”? Some scholars find it significant that Paul’s argument isn’t based on a passage of Scripture or on a theological principle. Instead, he appeals to “nature,” which is likely an appeal to the ancient Greek worldview that championed “nature” in their philosophy. In other words, he is referring to what is culturally normal.
The best 1 Corinthians commentary, based on aggregate academic reviews, explains the implications of this teaching for modern readers. Author Gordon Fee writes:
“Paul is not arguing that men must wear their hair short, or that women must have long hair, as though ‘nature’ meant some kind of ‘created order.’ Indeed, the very appeal to ‘nature’ in this way suggests most strongly that the argument is by way of analogy, not of necessity… After all, according to Acts 18:18 Paul had apparently worn long hair for a time in Corinth as part of a vow.” [2, emphasis added]
Why does Luke mention Paul’s hair in Acts 18:18? Luke mentions that Paul had his hair groomed before sailing to Syria during his second missionary journey. “After this, Paul stayed many days longer and then took leave of the brothers and set sail for Syria, and with him Priscilla and Aquila. At Cenchreae he had cut his hair, for he was under a vow” (ESV, emphasis added).
|NIV||“Paul stayed on in Corinth for some time. Then he left the brothers and sisters and sailed for Syria, accompanied by Priscilla and Aquila. Before he sailed, he had his hair cut off at Cenchreae because of a vow he had taken.”|
|NLT||“Paul stayed in Corinth for some time after that, then said good-bye to the brothers and sisters and went to nearby Cenchrea. There he shaved his head according to Jewish custom, marking the end of a vow. Then he set sail for Syria, taking Priscilla and Aquila with him.”|
|KJV||“And Paul after this tarried there yet a good while, and then took his leave of the brethren, and sailed thence into Syria, and with him Priscilla and Aquila; having shorn his head in Cenchrea: for he had a vow.”|
|NKJV||“So Paul still remained a good while. Then he took leave of the brethren and sailed for Syria, and Priscilla and Aquila were with him. He had his hair cut off at Cenchrea, for he had taken a vow.”|
|NASB||“Paul, having remained many days longer, took leave of the brethren and put out to sea for Syria, and with him were Priscilla and Aquila. In Cenchrea he had his hair cut, for he was keeping a vow.”|
Also see Is Laziness A Sin in the Bible? to learn more.
Why did Paul get a haircut? Though Luke doesn’t provide much information about Paul’s haircut, most scholars believe he had taken a Nazirite vow (cf. Num. 6:1-21). As Numbers explains, the Nazirite vow included not consuming certain foods and drinks for a period of time as well as not cutting one’s hair.
“All the days of his vow of separation, no razor shall touch his head. Until the time is completed for which he separates himself to the LORD, he shall be holy. He shall let the locks of hair of his head grow long” (Num. 6:5). Why did Paul take this vow? Luke doesn’t say. Scholars speculate that it was that Paul petitioned God for safety in travel, evangelistic success, or perhaps both. 
Was it a sin for Paul to cut his hair? No. The Nazirite vow anticipated it. Paul’s long hair wasn’t a sin, and neither was cutting it.
Also see Is Eating Meat A Sin? to learn more.
9 Bible verses about cutting your hair
- Leviticus 19:27, “You shall not round off the hair on your temples or mar the edges of your beard.”
- 1 Corinthians 11:14, “Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him”
- Judges 16:19, “She made him sleep on her knees. And she called a man and had him shave off the seven locks of his head. Then she began to torment him, and his strength left him.”
- 1 Peter 3:3, “Do not let your adorning be external—the braiding of hair and the putting on of gold jewelry, or the clothing you wear—”
- Ezekiel 44:20, “They shall not shave their heads or let their locks grow long; they shall surely trim the hair of their heads.”
- Leviticus 21:5, “They shall not make bald patches on their heads, nor shave off the edges of their beards, nor make any cuts on their body.”
- 1 Timothy 2:9, “Likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire”
- 2 Samuel 14:26, “And when he cut the hair of his head (for at the end of every year he used to cut it; when it was heavy on him, he cut it), he weighed the hair of his head, two hundred shekels by the king’s weight.”
- 2 Samuel 10:4, “So Hanun took David’s servants and shaved off half the beard of each and cut off their garments in the middle, at their hips, and sent them away.”
Also see Is Cheating On A Test A Sin? to learn more.
 New Bible Dictionary, p. 440.
 1 Corinthians by Gordon Fee. NICNT. p. 527
 Acts by Eckhard J. Schnabel. ZECNT. p. 767.
Daniel's seminary degree is in Exegetical Theology. He was a pastor for 10 years. As a professor, he has taught Bible and theology courses at two Christian universities. Please see the About page for details.
Contrary to popular belief, the Bible isn't prudish when it comes to sexual intimacy and its various expressions. In fact, some passages describe what many would consider graphic depictions of sex...
Sloth has always been an especially notorious sin in the Christian church because it's a behavior (or lack thereof) that is highlighted in the Bible as ungodly. Sloth is even one of the Seven Deadly...
The belief in astrological signs is that there are 12 signs, commonly referred to as zodiac signs.. Each of these elements influences a person’s attitude, personality traits, and behaviors (“Zodiac Signs and Astrology Signs Meanings and Characteristics,” Astrology Zodiac Signs ).. Earth element people are thought to be realistic, practical, and grounded (“Zodiac Signs and Astrology Signs Meanings and Characteristics,” Astrology Zodiac Signs ).. Within the elements, there is the belief that certain zodiac signs are compatible with other zodiac signs.. This means that some zodiac signs are more romantically inclined to other zodiac signs.. However, zodiac signs can also be compatible with other zodiac signs that are not in their element.. Fire signs are compatible with air signs and water signs are compatible with earth signs.. The belief of astrological signs teaches that we are born into a zodiac sign and our personality stems from being born on that day.. Each of these two zodiac signs is completely different from one another; however, most people could relate to their own personality traits being found in the description of both of these astrological signs.. This is because the writers and makers of astrological signs include a variety of different descriptions underneath each astrological sign in the hopes that you will find one that you relate to, which will then in turn, cause you to believe in the astrological sign as being part of who you are.
Christian Mysticism is a type of Christian spirituality that emphasizes the personal and experiential relationship between an individual and God.. Christian Mysticism often focuses on a particular experience or special revelation of God called a mystical experience.. Christian mysticism is a fascinating subject because it illustrates the unity of religious mysticism while also shedding light on the many different ways it has been expressed throughout the Christian faith’s history.. The union with God in Christian mysticism can be seen as a form of contemplation.. The Mystical path can be an excellent option for those who want to find God, develop in love, and experience oneness with God, as well as a significant transformation in their lives.
Each religious organization has their own special programs as part of the service of the organization.. Religious leader personal page, what you need to know?. Once pressing the button CHANGIA at the religious leader’s page, SADAKA network will give you an easier way to donate to a project under your Religious Leader and organization by choosing from one or more projects that are available and to support the projects that will benefit the church and the community at large.. Once pressing the button STORE at the religious leader’s page, SADAKA network will allow you to enter to the chosen religious leader personal store and to get access to his e-books, seminars, religious products, certificates and more.. You can donate money via Changia service directly to your religious leader’s project, or when using services such as Baraka, Maombi and Muongozo from your religious leader page Once you press the service you want you will see different amounts and you can choose the donation you desire and receive a service based on your donation.. Using SADAKA network services will bring great impact for this purpose as the religious leaders and organisations will be able to spread the word, activities and content among their members about upcoming events, activities and community projects.. Committed Membership elevates your religious connectivity by being a part of a community, expose yourself and your loved ones to unique advantages such as; community activities, special religious and non-religious benefits, special community offers and much more.. After selecting the religious leader and go to his personal page then click “Committed Member”, here you will find information details that you will required to fill in order to become a Committed Member of your Christian community and be exposed to community activities and getting access to benefits and special community offers.. BARAKA service allows you to enjoy periodical blessing messages services from your religious leaders as part of your periodical offering and support.. At the BARAKA page you will find several options of blessing messages to choose from as part of your periodical offering and support.
What do Christians believe?. Thus, within the broad umbrella of Christianity as a religion, Christian beliefs vary widely as each denomination subscribes to its own set of doctrines and practices.. There is only one God ( Isaiah 43:10; 44:6, 8; John 17:3; 1 Corinthians 8:5-6; Galatians 4:8-9).. God is three in one or a Trinity ; God the Father, Jesus Christ the Son, and the Holy Spirit (Matthew 3:16-17, 28:19; John 14:16-17; 2 Corinthians 13:14; Acts 2:32-33, John 10:30,17:11, 21; 1 Peter 1:2).. Jesus Christ is God (John 1:1, 14, 10:30-33, 20:28; Colossians 2:9; Philippians 2:5-8; Hebrews 1:8).. Jesus is the only way to God the Father (John 14:6; Matthew 11:27; Luke 10:22).. Jesus Christ died for the sins of each and every person in the world (1 John 2:2; 2 Corinthians 5:14; 1 Peter 2:24).. Those who reject Jesus Christ will go to hell forever after they die (Revelation 20:11-15, 21:8).. Those who accept Jesus Christ will live for eternity with him after they die (John 11:25, 26; 2 Corinthians 5:6).
Nor does it seem to have been what the KJV translators had in mind when they made their translation.. And it is not what the KJV translators meant when they translated parakletos by ‘Comforter’.. Here the KJV translates:. It is from the influence of the KJV translation of this verse that the Lord’s Supper is known in many Christian circles as ‘Communion’.. I think the KJV’s translation of this text is probably another that was good in the English of the early 17th century.. It seems that the KJV translators understood this and translated appropriately in the English of their day.. A third problem with the KJV is that it makes numerous significant mistakes in translation, many more than there are in modern English translations of the Bible.. The KJV translates this verse:. The TR was used by the translators of most Reformation-era Bible translations in various languages, including the KJV.. The earliest Greek manuscript containing the text used by the TR (and therefore by the KJV translators) at this point dates from no earlier than the 16th century.. There are many other passages too where the decision of the KJV’s translators to use the TR has resulted in a poor translation.. There are some today who believe that the KJV provides a perfect translation of the Bible!. The KJV therefore disagrees in numerous minor ways, and probably in some more significant ways too, with every other Bible translation, including those that predate the KJV by over a millennium.
My parents are not exactly the people. writing down the script and everything, but they help with it, by communicating. with indigenous people interested in it and designing books and ways to publish. these translations (sometimes, one big, complete Bible takes a long time to get. out, and isn’t always what the people want.). (And having the Bible accessible. is knowledge that is power, which is one of the things that I personally think makes my parents’. jobs so cool).. And about. 100 years back, when the dead sea scrolls were discovered near the … Dead Sea,. they compared these texts to the modern texts and they were virtually the same. (there were a few tiny differences, but if I remember correctly, a lot of that had. to do with ancient writers adding in historical contexts or the changes of. spelling or things like that, because language changes).. If people say that the scriptures are unreliable or that they have been. changed - it is good to press that idea, asking, how do they know that the. authors of this book are untrustworthy?. But as far as I’m aware, there’s no evidence. of the Bible being changed to help some people more than others.. So. if no one changed the resources, then the next question I wonder is whether the. authors were trustworthy.. - first up, if they were eyewitnesses of Jesus, then he. went through 8 different tests that lawyers investigate information with to see. if the eyewitness’ information was reliable.
From non-Christian writings of the period (both Jewish and Roman) we have various aspects of the New Testament account corroborated, including: when Jesus lived; where he lived; that his mother was named Mary and that his conception was irregular; that he was a renowned teacher; that he did things that both his friends and foes thought to be supernatural; that he was given the title ‘Messiah’; that he was executed, how, and by whom; that he had a brother who was also executed; that people claimed he was raised from the dead; and that his followers continued to worship him after he was gone.. In 1 Corinthians 15:6 Paul, a man who had violently opposed Jesus but later came to trust in him, writes that Jesus appeared to more than 500 people at one time – the majority of whom were still alive when Paul wrote and therefore available to confirm that what he claimed was indeed true.. A uniquely Christian response to this question is the fact that the Bible tells us that in Jesus God has himself suffered.. If you are struggling personally with the question of suffering at this time, you may find reading the book of Psalms in the Bible helpful.. For example, discussion can quickly become quite emotional with claims of prejudice and bigotry levelled at Christians for claiming that Jesus is the only way to God.. When Jesus himself claims that he is the only way (see John 14:6 ), Christians have no other option but to believe and state the same if they follow him.. It is about a relationship between people and God that is made possible through Jesus and his death and resurrection.. Pleasing God is not about trying to be good enough for God but rather responding to his un-earned mercy and love towards us in the Lord Jesus Christ.. There are a number of different ways that we might answer this question but one of the more helpful is by saying that the reasons that I know God exists are the same as the reasons I know that Napoleon existed.. The man Jesus claimed to be God.
Romans 8:29 tells us, “For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers and sisters.” This is the very basis of our salvation: that God, before the beginning of created time, chose us and called us to faith in Christ.. It proposes that man does have the capacity to choose, and that God, in His foreknowledge of the universe, knew that we would choose to believe in Him, and elected us.. Likewise, we all start out dead in our sins and transgressions, and end up needing salvation by choosing to have faith in Jesus Christ.. Calvinists believe that whether or not we choose God does not matter in His choosing of us, because we are completely unable to choose Him in our sinful state.. God, in His foreknowledge of the universe, sees that we would respond to His gospel by choosing to have faith in Christ, and therefore chooses us.
Hi, it’s Quaker Faith & Podcast with Mackenzie and Micah, and today, we’re talking about eldering and oversight, or elders and overseers.. Mackenzie: Right.. Mackenzie: I think so.. Micah: Like saying you’re eldering somebody.. But, so to talk about not just oversight as Ohio Yearly Meeting conceives of it, as a physical thing, but of shepherding as a holistic care for the individual which includes spiritual nurture, I think that a really … An important role of the shepherds is to help create … The shepherds and the teachers, is to help create an environment where there are succinct, simple, and clear answers available, but there’s also room and a culture of holding tension, and of accepting ambiguity, and exploring things, and developing discernment.